Disappointment in the 47th Legislative District
There were tears after the 47th Legislative District Democrats meeting tonight.
This was our meeting to endorse candidates for the 2006 primary election. There was some debate over Cantwell and a couple of votes against endorsement for her. A few people, including me, abstained. But the ayes had it, easy. No Washbloggian torments there tonight.
One race, however, was seriously contested. This is the State Senate race, in which Claudia Kauffman and Ed Crawford are running. I am a member of the endorsement committee in the 47th. Our committee had recommended a dual endorsement for this race.
Bryan Kesterson, the District Chair, presented that recommendation to the forty-eight voting members who were present. Then we debated. We debated for nearly two hours. A complicated set of motions went back and forth with amendments and counter-amendments. Many passionate speeches were given. I didn't talk; I listened, learned, and voted. When it was over, we had a sole endorsement for Ed. [correction 6/9 -- a single endorsement. Thanks to Gordon Glasgow in comments.]
A candidate in a contested race who wins a sole endorsement has a much higher likelihood of a win in the general election. The unendorsed candidate is left without the benefit of the District's money, volunteer help, or public blessing. It is a disappointing outcome for the person who does not win. Tonight, when the results of the vote were announced, there was heavy silence in the room, as if we were all holding our breaths.
Claudia Kauffman is qualified for this position. She has been running for months. She is experienced, capable, hard-working, and engaging. Many people have invested time, energy, and money in her campaign. Her presence in the race has been energizing for the district. Color is also an issue here, Claudia being of Native American heritage. I am not alone in the 47th in my preference, all other things being equal, for a candidate of color. The 47th is a culturally diverse community with representation that is not diverse. For all these reasons, and because Claudia's stands on political issues are very close to mine, I donated to her campaign as generously as I could and endorsed her early on. Tonight, I walked into that room with the intention of voting for a dual endorsement.
But I voted for Ed. Over the last two months, I had come to believe that Ed is a better choice for us here in the 47th this year. Despite that feeling I had still intended to vote for a dual endorsement, which I felt was necessary to uphold party and cross-cultural unity. But as I listened to my neighbors' speeches pro and con - and considered them in light of all my experiences in the past years and months -- my understanding of unity began to change. My feelings underwent a shift. We will have our unity, I realized. We have it already. In a race where the stakes for the community are high -- in which a sole endorsement will give Democrats a better chance to win in November, our district organization, our democracy, and our relationships across color and culture, are strong enough for me to be able to vote on my understanding of the merits. I can trust the people in that room, including the candidates and their supporters. I can trust the community. I can trust the democratic process.
I am proud of the two candidates who have served so competently and with such caring that they are worthy to be our Senators. I am proud that these two people from my community took the personal risk to put themselves on the line for us, to offer themselves for public service in full knowledge of all the hard work and risks that lie ahead. I am proud of the members of our district who sat in a room from 7pm to 10pm to speak with each other, to listen patiently and respectfully to each other, and to think and act with great care in a difficult situation. I am delighted with democracy itself, which so beautifully unfolded in front of us tonight.
Disappointment in the 47th Legislative District | 15 comments (15 topical)
|