Washblog

Ballot Tracking & Batch Accountability Explained

This issue remains important: Despite Monday's decision, REALS and others are determined to buy and use VoteHere's Mail-in Ballot Tracker.

The video from Monday's council meeting is now online. You need something like RealAlternative media player to watch it. My testimony starts at 1h22m, discussion resumes at 1h50m, and the elections staff feels the heat at 2h02m.

Under questioning, Director Sherril Huff continued to muddy the waters. Councilmember Julia Patterson, while well intentioned, made (value) statements I strongly disagree with.

Below the fold, I attempt to (better) explain the details of ballot tracking, which is distinct from batch accountability. I also attempt to respond to Patterson's enthusiasm for computerization.


Ballot Tracking

The executive's reckless plan proposes four steps in the mail balloting process, where each voter can monitor the status of their mail ballot.

  1. Mail ballot sent to voter
  2. Mail ballot received by election services
  3. Signature verified, voter credited with voting
  4. Mail ballot envelope opened

Only two of these steps, #2 and #3, are meaningful to voters.

Step #1 is unnecessary. All mail ballots are sent at the same time, by law. There is no need (whatsoever) for this to be tracked per voter. Voters can rely on the existing notices, such as this one from August 1st.

Steps #2 and #3 are good tracking points. Happily, this is the current system. Voters can call (phone) to verify the status of their ballots. In fact, all of the data is already available online, in bulk form. Adding a simple web interface to this existing system is the cheapest, easiest, most obvious solution. (We can already track the status of provisional ballots using the internet. What I'm proposing is no different.)

Step #4 is just silly. If the signature has been verified, there's no reason to know when the ballot envelope was opened. REALS fabricated this "requirement" to justify buying VoteHere's Mail-in Ballot Tracker.

As proof, here's the findings of the voter focus group REALS conducted (exhibit 3, under the heading "Ballot Tracking"):


Overwhelmingly, the stage people were most interested in checking was that their
envelope had been received by King County Elections.  Many people were happy
to put their faith in King County and its process as long as they could verify that
their ballot had been received. ...

...

...the majority felt confident that if their ballot had been received and
signature verified, it would be counted.  Tabulation was not as high of a priority
as these first two steps.

Batch Accountability

VoteHere's MiBT is being pitched as a labor reducing measure. I don't buy it.

The rough outline of inbound mail ballot processing can be found in exhibit 1. We care about these steps:

  1. Inbound returns via USPS, ballot drop boxes, and poll sites.
  2. Receipt and subsequent scan, sort, and batch.
  3. Signature verification of each ballot packet.
  4. Opening, extraction and visual check of ballots.
  5. Ballot duplication. Canvass Board ruling.
  6. Ballot tabulated.

Once the ballots have been sorted and placed into batches (step 5), the ballots must be counted at each processing step. Currently, those counts are written on a paper batch slip. With VoteHere's Mail-in Ballot Tracker, the counts would (presumably) be entered directly.

So the big difference is data entry (into a big spreadsheet) vs data entry (into MiBT).

Well. It hardly seems worth the upfront (over $1,200,000) and ongoing (estimated $1,320,000 per year) costs.

(I'd happily bang out a little forms entry utility and donate it to the county, if I thought it'd be used.)

Problems With Computerization Part One

Councilmember Julia Patterson believes that using computers will reduce human error. I'm sorry, but only people who don't have experience with computers (and sales people) think that. There's a cliche that applies:


To error is human;
To really mess things up, you need a computer.

Computerization (digitization) and automation are not the same. Automation is when you remove all decisions (human judgment). Only then does it sometimes make sense to computerize a process.

Too much of what our elections officials are trying to do is computerizing tasks that still require human judgment (decision making). That's when the problems happen, despite all the good intentions and will power mustered.

Problems With Computerization Part Two

If a task or process is computerized, I can't observe it. Our state constitution guarantees a public vote count. Meaning I should be able to observe the entire process.

I believe all these new fangled election technologies are unconstitutional, in spirit if not in law. That includes computerized voting, automatic signature verification, electronically modifying ballots (votes), etc.

< Baird is coming back to town (Raymond and Oly) | Rep. Brian Baird leaves a phone message >
Display: Sort:
Display: Sort:

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

 

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News