Washblog

The Peak Oil Conversation - Part 2

To the three of you who posted comments to my previous post on peak oil, thank you.  It will be through such dialogue that we will spread the word, while learning form one another.  In fact, as recently as this morning I made connections with a couple of activists and acquired links to new resources that will be useful to me.

A very helpful acquaintance read my previous and suggested that I had failed to answer three key questions that some of you may have had.  So this post will try to rectify that little shortcoming.  The questions are: 1) What is peak oil and what are its implications to my community?  2) What can be done about it?  and 3) Are we approaching peak oil?

So, follow me over the jump and see if my answers are useful to you.  Then post a comment to keep the conversation going.

What is Peak Oil and What Are Its Implications for My Community?

Let's begin with a single oil field.  Once a drilling rig taps the reservoir of underground oil, production begins.  The initial flow is under pressure and is top quality oil - what they call "light, sweet crude."  Additional holes are drilled so that production increases.  As more and more oil is extracted, pressure is reduced and something (natural gas or sea water for example) is injected to keep the pressure up.  At some point, peak production occurs.  That is, the best quality (and easiest to extract) oil is out, and the remaining oil is increasingly hard to extract and of lesser quality.  This "peak" (or point of maximum extraction) occurs when about half the oil has been pumped.  You can drill more holes and employ "advanced extraction techniques" all you want.  That peak level of production will never be matched.  From that point forward, production in that field will decline.

In 1956, M. King Hubbert, a Shell Oil geophysicist, reported that peak production followed peak discovery by about 40 years.  He projected that oil production in the continental U.S. would peak in 1970.  He was ridiculed and/or ignored, but he was right.  Using his methodology (more or less), various people have offered projections for the global peak ranging from 1995 to 2050.  Some people, including yours truly (and the Energy Watch Group of Germany,) believe the Global Peak occurred in 2005 or 2006.

To appreciate the implications for "My Community," it might help to think back to the days before fossil fuels came on line.  Mind you, I don't remember when most work was done by muscle power (either man or domesticated animal) but my 80 year old Mom does.  She was a child during the Great Depression, and her Dad was a tenant farmer, aka sharecropper.  Plowing was done behind oxen or mules.  They went to town in a horse drawn wagon.  No power tools, refrigerators or color TVs.

Fossil fuels, or hydrocarbon energy sources such as coal, crude oil and natural gas, allowed machines to do many, many times the amount of work a man or a mule could do.  From the time coal was first used to drive a crude steam engine in the late 17th century, right down to the present day, fossil fuels have done ever increasing amounts of our work for us.  And we like it that way, don't we?

Well, once global oil production peaks, it will begin to decline, just as the field above did.  If, as is universally expected, demand for oil and its products continues to rise, then we will have a "supply is not meeting demand" sort of situation.  Many people are saying that we are there now.

I should stop for a moment and explain that crude oil gives, by far, a better "bang for the buck" than either coal or natural gas.  It is easier to extract and transport than the other two, on a dollar for energy generated basis.  It is also more flexible.  You can do more things with it.  From fuel oil to jet fuel to gasoline; from plastics to pharmaceuticals; from petroleum jelly to pesticides; crude oil does it all.  (By the way, there are peak scenarios for coal, natural gas and even uranium as well.  I'll leave those for someone else.)

So, from that you should have a hint of what some of the implications will be.  Transportation is the one folks think of first, mainly in terms of commuting to work, shopping etc.  We feel it as a price crunch.  (I felt it just last night when I gassed up.)  But it is really a supply crunch, manifesting itself initially as rising prices.  Shortfalls in supply will follow.

The other aspect of transportation will hit home when you go shopping.  Almost nothing that we are accustomed to buying is made close to where we live.  From food to furniture to fine fabrics, it all travels by train, plane, ship and semi from faraway places like China, Guatemala and Fiji.  Rising fuel prices and supply disruptions will affect it all.

Suppose you own a small business that doesn't use much hydrocarbon energy.  You're probably feeling pretty safe, right?  But look downstream.  Will these circumstances affect your customer's ability to buy your products or services?  Or look upstream to your suppliers.  How will they be affected?

Most of us work for a living.  Will the price or availability of fuel affect our employer's willingness to keep us on the payroll if his bottom line is getting pinched?  Airlines have been seriously inconvenienced by recent fuel price increases.  Do you think that will affect the folks who make airplanes?

How much plastic do we use (and throw away) on a daily basis?  I don't just mean water bottles, either.  Almost everything we touch has some plastic associated with it.  Polyester and miracle micro-fibers as well as computers and cell phones - all depend on the amazing flexibility of crude oil (and natural gas.)

A few paragraphs back I casually dropped the word "food" into a list of things we buy when we go shopping.  I should tell you that this little item worries me more than all the rest.  You see, we need some of it every day.  When money or supply is short, we can't just do without it for a week or two.

It has been said that the age of the 2000 mile salad is coming to an end.  The same is true for tropical fruit in February.

Well, I think I'll stop now.  I expect you have enough to contemplate.  In fact, I think I will deal with the other two questions in a later post.  But before I shut off the computer, I have one more important thing to say.

Anyone who tells you that renewable energy will solve this problem for us is either delusional, dishonest or running for office.  (Mind you, the latter doesn't rule out either or both of the former.)  No combination of solar, wind, hydro, geothermal or even nuclear will allow us to keep doing what we are doing now.  In the absence of cheap, plentiful crude oil, the American lifestyle as we know it is unsustainable.  That goes for most of the so-called "first world" countries as well.  (Denmark, Iceland and a few others have already powered down enough that they may be able to stay about where they are.)

But that should properly be part of the "What can be done about it?" discussion, shouldn't it?

So comment, why doncha?  Let's dialogue.  I am ready to learn from you.

< Bring Barack Back | On Touring The World, Or, Blogging-It's A Collective Thing >
Display: Sort:
Display: Sort:

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

 

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Related Links

+ previous post
+ JWMchew's Diary

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News