Urgency about death, dying, political failure and why suddenly I feel sheepish ...
I'm not a Democrat first and a patriotic civic-minded American citizen second.
I'm not one of the local flagship bloggers who don't seem to be able to resist showing off their political savvy and acumen obtained and presumably earned over perhaps five years of political struggle complete with battle scars that make others swoon in the moonlight.
No I don't swoon and although a late-comer in terms of speaking out, I'm not a late-comer in terms of seeking out political truth for civic reasons, voting my conscience and having my own collection of scars - some inflicted before most readers under 40 years old were born - and much deeper than some supposed shame in my state's possible loss of a senate seat to a Republican.
I'm also not a member of the fighting keyboardists who talk about war, Iraq and collateral damage as if it were some aspect to a video game where the pleasure is in pretend.
Military families (those who speak out, those who can't and those who don't dare) are all part of one big family whose actual and potential sacrifice on behalf of this nation is way out of proportion with the rest of the country. Those of us who speak out have not been fooling with theories, strategies nor tactics that pander to my blogging colleagues and their pretense that lock-step voting and campaigning will lead to the most prompt and immediate end to death and dying.
Truth is, we have no guarantee that a Democratic sweep of both houses will lead to the quickest end to death and dying in Iraq.
We have no guarantee that a democratically controlled congress will have as its first or highest priority, the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the consequential immediate lowering of the amount of gasoline America's presence in Iraq pours on the fires of resistance and contributes to our family losses and killing of Iraqi civilians.
We do face a strong likelihood that a foolish newly elected Democratic majority will arrogantly allot to itself a greater wisdom in how to get the job done in Iraq and how to accomplish what Bush and neocon nutcases (Just ask Francis Fukuyama ) couldn't do right. If you want proof, go to the Democratic Leadership Council site and read their foreign policy nonsense.
Mark my words and I promise you that if/when party takeover of Congress happens, my words will be true:
The Demos will attempt to accomplish the same goals the Republicans couldn't.
The Demos will not take immediate action to remove the troops and get this country's inflammatory presence out from its position as the direct cause of dreadful effects in Iraq.
Too many voters and leaders see this from an abstract point of view and so long as it remains an abstraction, the competitive gaming-lure of strategic debate remains more enticing and involving than actually staunching the flow of blood.
We are seeing DLC strategy played out even as I write this. We are seeing why Cantwell, the DLC/neocon under-informed foreign policy lightweight, believes that she can go through motions with folks like we who've met with her, that she can ultimately point to having met with us several times and heard us out, and then do nothing inconsistent with her unchanged attitude, philosophy and voting record.
In the meantime, the DLC/Democratic tactic of doing nothing while Republican scandals multiply seemingly exponentially - thereby facilitating a greater probability of their being swept out of power - means that the DLC/Democratic tactic is also to express that two military and several civilian deaths every single day in Iraq are needful and worth the price of doing nothing.
How would you like to be standing at the lip of a human meat grinder watching your military loved one move forward in the sacrificial line and listen to do-nothing Democrats like Maria - who are content to do nothing but watch eroding Republican popularity - tell you that when your loved one steps off the lip and into the grinder, it's for a higher national good?
But if we acquiesce, shut our mouths and pretend that supporting Ms. Cantwell is the wisest and most patriotic act we can take, we fool ourselves and pass me another glass of Kool-Aid.
What can we count on if we let the Democratic Party stay fully managed by DLC centrists and their local party fools in every state? Will stopping the killing in Iraq be one of the highest priorities - like, for example - putting out a house fire where people are dying?
From their own site where pretense begins with the visual illusion that the DLC is somehow "official" party authority:
Democrats should begin by reaffirming their party's commitment to progressive internationalism -- the belief that America can best defend itself by building a world safe for individual liberty and democracy.
They can pretend they sit "between" neo-imperial and non-interventionist, but they are still advocating spreading American's version of corporate capitalistic democracy from the barrel of gun if necessary.
The barrel of a gun philosophy is the precise reason why today, tomorrow, the next day and every f***ing day from here on out two soldiers and who knows how many Iraqi civilians will be killed while politicians and parties in this country continue to behave badly, unwisely and stand with their fingers stuck up their politically failed orifices.
Geov Parrish expressed the problem we face with blind and nervous support of the (D)-bird in hand versus more appropriate alternative (D)-birds in the bushes around America where dumb DLC Democrats need them to stay.
After doing more homework, something I recommend to local party strategists, I'm feeling more sheepish than ever, going to have to flip flop and withdraw my declaration of intent to vote for Maria Cantwell in my party's primary election.
There is a significantly more important election for Democrats than the November midterm and that is their soul-searching primary election - regardless of all those "in-place" leadership Demos and self-appointed PAC apologist-type party activists who have yet to prove that they possess a higher wisdom for the well-being of this country and that they can win with it.
Until or unless they ever do, I'm not throwing in with them.
I'm not throwing away any opportunity to say that I also have a voice that is NOT traitorous to America because it disagrees with narrow party fearful thoughts
I also have a voice and ask everyone else who reads me to speak up, even if your voice shakes - or even if others who read me tell you, like they tell me, to shut the hell up. We have opinions that can and should be expressed in a public venue regardless of who likes it and who doesn't.
At this stage in the midterm election process, the (D) bird in hand is not worth more than what's out in the bushes. The one in hand has made no declaration that expresses anything other than a DLC/neocon foreign policy foolishness that in this case has a disproportionate share of the families in this country at risk for paying the highest price for everyone else's right to live free or die.
Like General Zinni, as a veteran, I served to preserve the right I myself and all of you have to speak out, to dissent, to criticize presidents and senators. Folks like us have the least obligation to shut up or defer to other folks who didn't serve, who have no intention of serving and who in fact live in a world of political and economic abstractions based on pretense.
Why in the land of the free and home of the brave where Lincoln sits on a granite chair, and where a rowdy group of 18th century dissenters are now revered as founding fatherly icons of the United States of America, who the hell has the right to say or imply that what Mark Wilson stands for isn't good enough?
In Washington State Democratic hands is a bird who wants to just sit in your hand, look pretty, look senatorial and do nothing of immediate good for this country.
In the Democratic bushes however is a candidate who has spoken out, who has gotten up off his ass and put his money and his personal life where his mouth is.
All of a sudden I have to ask why that isn't good enough?
Why is it shameful or stupid to recognize that?
Why can't a citizen run and a party respect that running? (BTW: I still haven't seen explanation or justification from King County or Suzy Sheary - see my wonderings on 5/11/06)
Why do people who haven't taken that step have the gall to pretend they are greater judges of American character, core values and citizenship, not to mention behaving as self-appointed expert advocates of political expediency?
Why must we settle for mediocrity because that's the Republican standard in this country?
Why must we diminish ourselves and concede to an ignorant lower standard of political acumen, civic duty and citizenship patriotism?
Why are so many of us fearful of standing up, speaking out and working to make a difference?
Why do so many pretend it is wise to accept mediocrity out of a fear of the loss of one election, a fear that leaves us caught in the headlights and too terrorized or intimidated to do more than stare at an oncoming disaster, hoping it passes by with as little damage as possible?
Why are so many afraid to fight?
Is it more convenient because Maria Cantwell gives an excuse not to get in there and mix it up directly with the bad guys?
to sit back, vote Maria in the primary, tell everyone else to be quiet?
And wait for Cantwell to do the dirty work of resisting and overcoming the Republican villains?
When she's demonstrated that she voted to support dirty work in the first place?
I'll say it again, I'm not a Democrat first and a patriotic civic-minded American citizen second.
And there are no lines to read between here.
I do not endorse Maria Cantwell who hesitates and has lost for herself and for all of us more than we can measure.
I do endorse Mark Wilson.
Review of "The Little Blue Book": How to Influence Others to Think Democratically
By EWVoters (0 comments)
Mitt Romney Has a 2 in 3 Chance of beating Obama and has already won the GOP Nomination
By TJ Walker (0 comments)
Related Links+ Francis Fukuyama
+ Geov Parrish
+ wonderings on 5/11/06
+ More on Building the base
+ Also by Arthur Ruger
Local MediaCoastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM
Peninsula Daily News
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Central Kitsap Reporter
KONP 1450 AM
Sound and Islands
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
South Whidbey Record
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM
North Puget Sound
The Northern Light
Skagit Valley Herald
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM
Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Mercer Island Reporter
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM
South Puget Sound
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
Tacoma News Tribune
KAOS 89.3 FM
KOWA FM 106.5
Ellensburg Daily Record
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
The Newport Miner
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
Cheney Free Press
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
KTCR 1340 AM
Moscow-Pullman Daily News