Washblog

Pictures from KC convention

With minimal commentary, I'll post a link to these pictures that I took at the convention yesterday.
Pictures from King County convention

There was some contentiousness during the last hour and a half, during the debates over platform planks and rules. One man walked out mad, others were reprimanded for "speechifying". Other objectors were asked to suggest alternate language to the platform committee. We ran out of time before the resolutions.

But first, the speeches:
Darcy Burner's speech was eloquent in that simple and sincere style most people can relate to. The former Microsofty said becoming a mother 3 years ago spurred her desire to turn our country to a better direction. She appeared modest yet confident, and unfazed by the probability that she would be the target of smear attacks by Republicans during this campaign season: "I have no skeletons in my closet, so they'll have to invent some." I think she's noticeably more confident than at the Crab Feast in February. My husband was "blown away" by Darcy. I'm still trying to persuade him to canvass for her, like I plan to do next weekend.

More below:

Maria Cantwell's grand entrance was accompanied by an 8-piece marching drum corps and plenty of cheerleaders. (I was about to write "trumpeted" but there were no non-percussive instruments.) That may have masked the fact that (my guess) at least a quarter of those described in the P-I article as the "party faithful" were not fans of hers. Those delegates & party members held Wilson signs, talked at length with Wilson, applauded Cantwell only politely or not at all, or remained seated when others rose in ovation. A few even called out critical remarks during the extended introduction by her "close friend" from NARAL.

Ivan says the marching band thing is commonplace at Dem conventions. Maybe so, but it rubbed me the wrong way. Because this convention seemed otherwise a low-key event. Every other VIP, including McDermott and Inslee, ambled into the hall with no fanfare and chatted with delegates before taking the podium. I suppose if I loved Cantwell, I might've found the drum-and-cymbals intro exciting, but since I don't, it seemed pretentious.

She did give a rousing speech with a strong, confident voice. To her credit, she acknowledged upfront that the party is a big tent with differing points of view: "So I wish Mark Wilson luck, but not too much." Yes, the so-called "Year of Transition" for Iraq that bugs David so much was mentioned, but mostly she spoke about reproductive rights, education, and energy policy, if I recall.

I thought Mark's presentation was the smoothest I've seen him. He had only 3 minutes to speak, and had timed it perfectly. He started out thanking the party for receiving "even an outsider like myself" graciously, and giving him the privilege of speaking to the delegates. A little about his own family and background as a Marine and Veteran for Peace, then on to issues. He said that if you want a bi-partisan politician, vote for Cantwell, because he intends to be an obstructionist to the Bush agenda.

The other candidate for WA Senator was Hong Tran. She made good points, but sounded a little nervous and went over the 3- minute time limit. She was about to be cut off abruptly, but many audience members called out "let her finish!"

Candidate Rodney Thom, who recently switcherooed from Repub to Dem in the state legislature, was also an effective speaker. He was low-key, but his most memorable line was: "I've met Dave Reichart, I know Dave Reichart, and he's dumb as a rock." That drew gasps and snickers.

< Action Item: Help Darcy Burner Get Netroots Endorsed | Colbert and those he makes nervous. >
Display: Sort:
the drumline routine is relatively common (see Sims, Ron), but that doesn't make it any less annoying.  I'm with you - it's annoying, I don't care who's doing it.

And Rodney Tom is dead-on right about Dave Reichert.  I would have said "dumb as a bag of hammers", but I have too much respect for hammers...

Switzerblog'll knock you out!

by switzerblog on Sun May 07, 2006 at 11:21:28 PM PST

* 1 5.00 3 *



I understand that the KC convention compared poorly to the TRIUMPH of the the 36th district convention. I understand that Dana Laurent and the lovely Kelley Bevans have set the standard for efficient Dem events.

I don't know, I just hear these things.

by dlaw on Mon May 08, 2006 at 09:55:12 AM PST

* 2 5.00 2 *


  • Those two by dinazina, 05/08/2006 12:04:45 PM PST (5.00 / 2)
Apparently, the Senator felt the need to issue a press release to simmer down the whole "marching band" flap.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

by Belltowner on Mon May 08, 2006 at 10:03:13 AM PST

* 3 5.00 1 *


I wish I had a camera, so I could have taken a picture of the cute little cultists from the LaRouche Youth Movement singing out front.  It sounded like hymns.  I watched for a while.  Curiousity always gets me into trouble.

After a bit, I approached and started asking questions.  Apparently what I heard was Bach.  It sounded more like the warbling my grandma did during church service, where the pious Christian singers all try to outshine the other.  I told they sounded pretty good and asked how many hours a day they practiced.  I also asked if they lived together or separately.  Separately, but it sounded like many had apartments in the same building.  

Happily, I learned that my cherished New Wave music is from the "dark ages".  Having survived a childhood under Reagan, I couldn't really disagree.

I also asked "You guys realize you look silly, right?  That's not a value statement.  I'm just saying."  Turns out that nobody likes to have their music criticized.

Then I asked how they could afford such great flyers and such.  I was given the impression they weren't cheap.  One of the more normal ones looked directly at me and said "Yea, give us some money."   An interesting fund raising technique.  I laughed and most of the group went back inside.

I feel bad for these kids.  I've always wondered what type of person signs up for stuff like the Branch Davidians.  The world is big and scary and I guess I can understand the need to latch onto something bigger than yourself, something important.  Larouche certainly has a compelling, if completely and utterly unhinged, comprehensive worldview explaining everything.

In more practical terms, I hope they run out of steam sooner rather than later.  (Sadly, Scientology and Dianetics survived L. Ron Hubberd.)  Two of the LYMs haunt our monthly 46 LD Dems.  I really don't want to lumped together with these guys.   I'm hoping someone suggests that they'd do better infiltrating the GOP.

by zappini on Mon May 08, 2006 at 08:05:26 PM PST

* 6 5.00 2 *


I'm new to party politics, so I'm still just taking it all in.  I hope to attend some GOP events, so I can compare and contrast a bit better.  (The Democrats and Republicans are stereotypically different.  It's amazing to see.)  I joined the 46 LD Dems earlier this year.  Our monthly meeting is run very well.  

Our 46 LD caucus a week or two back was fun and efficient.  And while our LD platform is big and unwieldy, I'm pretty happy with it.  It certainly hits all the bases.  Of course, the resolutions we introduced during the precinct caucus were summarily executed (or warped enough to render them pointless) by the "platform committee", which is unfortunate.  I don't mind too much; for now I'm content to learn how the game is played.

I have no idea how the King Co platform was developed.  It's completely missing the election integrity section's items from the 46 LD.  But otherwise, I found it pretty good.  Shorter than our LD platform.  Which is good.  Because I believe that less is more.

I thought the KC caucus itself was fun and a bit disorganized.  We were all stuffed into too small of a space.  Which is both good and bad.  Someone finally woke up and opened up the partitions, expanding the space into the rest of the room.  Which was unused because the tablers were in the way.  Pretty dumb logistics, really.

One thing that always happens during these progressive and liberal events is that people mingle and chatter.  That's great "energy", if a bit rude.  What's bad is not being able to hear the speakers.  Which actually kind of pisses me off most of the time.

Please, please, if you have any pull: Tell the organizers of these things to do better audio.  PA speakers for the back of the room would have been nice.  Turning up the @#$%&!! volume (when I asked) would have been nice too.

Also, please tell these organizers that we have the Internets on computers now.  All of these events should be taped, archived, and made available for downloading online.

---

Jim McDermott gave his 2006 stump speech.  It was more or less the same speech given at the 11 LD Dems monthly meeting.  We need to put Democrats in the Wash DC to take the gavel away from the GOP.  I like this speech.  He got a warm response.  The style worked a lot better with the smaller 11 LD crowd.  Of course, if the sound (audio) was better, that could have been a positive difference too.

Maria Cantwell gave her 2006 stump speech.  She's pretty good on the stump.  It was the same speech I heard at the 46 LD caucus.  

The lady who introduced Cantwell was awful.  Past president of NARAL?  Singed praises for Cantwell's record.  I don't care.  I want to know Cantwell's she's done for me lately.  All her progressiveness and enviromental awareness and pro-Bill of Rights are completely for naught these days.

Left unmentioned was Cantwell's vote for Bush's Folly in Iraq or Cantwell's very recent c