Washblog

Iraq strategy,4 legged stool - Diplomacy, Political Reconciliation, Economic Recovery, Military

 
-Major General John Batiste, US Army (retired); The following is an op-ed I wrote two weeks ago, which neither the Wall Street Journal or Washington Times wanted to consider,so I'm posting it ---
( read it here).

Quoting excerpt from Maj. General Batiste op-ed Aug 22, 2007;
Our all-volunteer military cannot continue the current cycle of deployments for much longer. America's national strategy in Iraq is akin to a four legged stool with legs representing diplomacy, political reconciliation, economic recovery, and the military. The glue holding it all together must be the mobilization of the United States in support of the incredibly important effort to defeat world-wide Islamic extremism. The only leg on the stool of any consequence is the military-it is solid titanium and high performing, the best in the world. After almost six years since September 11, our country is not mobilized behind this important work and the diplomatic, political, and economic legs are not focused and lack leadership. Most Americans now appreciate that the military alone cannot solve the problem in Iraq. In this situation, the stool will surely collapse.

 God, I hope Brian Baird talked to some of the Generals besides Petraeus when Baird decided he needed to now advocate for keeping troops in Iraq

It's been a mean week for this family in learning of my Rep. Brian Baird's new assessment of what America's foreign policy should be in Iraq  --  continue the military presence.  

Yeah, right, continue leaning so heavily on the one leg of the stool while failing to use the other three legs -- diplomacy, political reconciliation and economic recovery.  

I don't think we need the military presence there for the other three legs to be put in place. If anything, the other three legs need to bear some weight and not leave it strictly to the military leg of the stool.  The military has completed their mission, and should not have to wait under threat of death, for this Administration, Congress, America to get busy completing their part of the mission.

  But then I'm biased, some would say, you know cause my son-in-law is going back to Iraq in October for his second  --- read carefully   extended, 'stop-lossed', 15 month deployment while we hear it whispered that it will be 18 months.  When his unit gets to Iraq, another 'stop-loss' extension will be added to the already extended, 'stop-loss' 15 month deployment.  Both the returning Iraq veterans in our family already served an extended, stop-lossed, 15 month deployment in Iraq.  

  Why isn't that part of the 'news' Petraeus will be bringing to this Administration and Congress (my Rep. Brian Baird)? The extended deployments, the 'stop-lossed' deployments, the intention to add stop loss on stop loss - 18 month deployments?  What does that have to do with the supposed six month surge - which is just an increment measure given to the American public so they will hold out another six months -- six months at a time, and now it is five years.   How much more obvious can it be that with a troop shortage and troop exhaustion and military families exhaustion, that there are no more troops to keep fighting in Iraq and assuredly not in Iran.  

  Rumors of pre-emptive strike into Iran loom closer and closer.  My gut tells me that my son-in-law doesn't have 15 or 18 months of 'mission' in Iraq - more that he with thousands more of the troops are being readied and positioned for something else.

  Quoting the General (Maj General Batiste) again;

The only way to stabilize Iraq and allow our military to rearm and refit for the long fight ahead is to begin a responsible and deliberate redeployment from Iraq and replace the troops with far less expensive and much more effective resources-those of diplomacy and the critical work of political reconciliation and economic recovery. In other words, when it comes to Iraq, it's time for conservatives to once again be conservative.

  - Major General John Batiste, US Army (retired)

  (P.S.my note, I like the four legged stool analogy, because it engenders the ring of truth; and also because a four legged stool analogy is used in my faith - scripture, tradition, reason & experience)

  (p.p.s. -- I wouldn't mind a recommend on this diary, so if you're inclined give it a recommend boost... I didn't think it merited front page story, which is why I made it a diary instead of a front page story, but I did want it here at Washblog. Thanks for reading, and hope you read the entire Maj. General Batiste op-ed.)

< On the Passing of Karen Marchioro | New Jersey Likes These Clean Elections--How About WA? >
Display: Sort:
So here goes.

It's been a mean week for this family in learning of my Rep. Brian Baird's new assessment of what America's foreign policy should be in Iraq  --  continue the military presence.

I can only imagine how it feels, Lietta.

About Baird's "new assessment": the most detailed description I could find of how he thinks "facts on the ground have changed" is contained in his Times Op-Ed of August 24th. Here are his claims, one by one:

Our soldiers are reclaiming ground and capturing or killing high-priority targets on a daily basis.

How does he know this is true? Which ground is being reclaimed? How often have soldiers reclaimed ground, only to lose it when they leave? What's a high-priority target? How many of these high-priority targets have been promptly replaced by other high-priority targets?

Sheiks and tribal groups are uniting to fight against the extremists and have virtually eliminated al-Qaida from certain areas.

How does he know how big a factor al-Qaida has been in "certain areas?" How often have commanders called anyone they don't like "al-Qaida in Iraq?" What accurate count do we have of al-Qaida's presence in Iraq? Whare are the "certain areas?" Who are the "extremists?" Isn't it true that the U.S. military has been arming these sheiks and tribal groups? How many of these weapons are used, and will be used, in ordinary sectarian warfare?

The Iraqi military and police are making progress in their training, taking more responsibility for bringing the fight to the insurgents and realizing important victories.

Again, how does he know this? Who told him that "military and police are making progress in their training?" Haven't we heard this before? What's changed? What about the repeated claims that Iraqi police are aiding the insurgents? And what "important victories," specifically, have they won? What's "important" about them?

Businesses and factories that were once closed are being reopened and people are working again.

Where is this happening and how does he know it's happening? Are there businesses in other places that have recently closed? Which people are working again? All of them, some of them, or a few of them? And what work are they doing?

The infrastructure is gradually being repaired and markets are returning to life.

What evidence does he have that the infrastructure is gradually being repaired? How gradual? How often is infrastructure repaired and then destroyed again? What markets are returning to life? What does "returning to life" mean? How many Iraqis have recently died in those markets "returning to life?"

I don't find what Baird is saying to be credible. Baird has suggested that people are not listening to him, but what is there to listen to?

Most importantly, I don't understand Baird's newfound faith that the Bush administration can actually accomplish anything, anywhere, constructive. What, exactly, have they done to deserve his trust?

by DWE on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 08:32:34 AM PST

* 1 none 0 *



Keith Olberman, MSNBC, today, Sept 4, and his anger is obvious at President Bush for 'playing' us yet again on Iraq, the surge, and General Patraeus report in Septemeber.  

A worthwhile video, and I earnestly hope Brian Baird will have a chance to see it as well, and read the new book to see what this President really has in mind for September Patreaus report.    

New York Times - quoting from new book, 'Dead Certain', by author Robert Draper;

For now, though, Mr. Bush told the author, Robert Draper, in a later session, "I'm playing for October-November." That is when he hopes the Iraq troop increase will finally show enough results to help him achieve the central goal of his remaining time in office: "To get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence," and, he said later, "stay longer."

But fully aware of his standing in opinion polls, Mr. Bush said his top commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, would perhaps do a better job selling progress to the American people than he could.

Mr. Draper agreed to share parts of his transcripts from those interviews, and the book itself, with The New York Times under the agreement that they would not be published until shortly before the book, "Dead Certain" (Free Press), is officially released on Tuesday.

On the Surge in Iraq "--we have set the bar so low it's buried in the sand at this point." - Barack Obama

by Lietta Ruger on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 08:18:15 PM PST

* 4 none 0 *


  I would like to offer deep appreciation.  I can't seem to find the feature that shows me who recommended this diary, so I'm blind on that, but I remain grateful nonetheless.  

   

On the Surge in Iraq "--we have set the bar so low it's buried in the sand at this point." - Barack Obama

by Lietta Ruger on Tue Sep 04, 2007 at 08:24:53 PM PST

* 6 none 0 *


Display: Sort:

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

 

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News