Washblog

Depleted Uranium Study Amendment Passed in House

On May 10th, Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) and Chris Shays (R-CT) introduced H.AMDT.818, an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (HR 5122). The McDermott-Shays amendment calls for the "Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Health and Human Services," to "conduct a comprehensive study of the health effects of exposure to depleted uranium munitions." Yesterday, the House passed the amendment in a voice vote and subsequently passed the entire bill. HR 5122, with the McDermott-Shays amendment, now moves on to the Senate.

For you wonky wonks, here is the McDermott-Shays amendment in its entirety:

Amendment to H.R. 5122, as Reported
Offered by Mr. McDermott of Washington
and Mr. Shays of Connecticut

At the end of subtitle B of title IV (page 268, after line 9), add the following new section:

SEC. 716. STUDY OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO DEPLETED URANIUM

(a)    STUDY. -The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall conduct a comprehensive study of the health effects of exposure to depleted uranium munitions on uranium-exposed soldiers and on children of uranium-exposed soldiers who were born after the exposure of the uranium-exposed soldiers to depleted uranium.
(b)    URANIUM-EXPOSED SOLDIERS.--In this section, the term "uranium-exposed soldiers" means a member or former member of the Armed Forces who handled, came in contact with, or had the likelihood of contact with depleted uranium munitions while on active duty, including members and former members who--
(1)    were exposed to smoke from fires resulting from the burning of vehicles containing depleted uranium munitions or fires at depots at which depleted uranium munitions were stored;
(2)    worked within environments containing depleted uranium dust or residues from depleted uranium munitions;
(3)    were within a structure or vehicle while it was struck by a depleted uranium munition;
(4)    climbed on or entered equipment or structures struck by a depleted uranium munition; or
(5)    were medical personnel who provided initial treatment to members of the Armed Forces described in paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4).

Rep. McDermott has long been concerned about the possible long-term health consequences of exposure to depleted uranium. He has introduced depleted uranium study bills in the last two Congresses, the last of which was HR 2410. Representatives McKinney (D-GA) and Serrano (D-NY) have also introduced depleted uranium bills. All of these bills have languished in the Republican-controlled House. However, with Rep. Shays as co-sponsor, Rep. McDermott managed to get his amendment passed this week.

The amendment represents a big step forward for those who believe we need better scientific understanding of the long-term health effects of depleted uranium exposure. Nonetheless, the bill raises some interesting questions:

  • How much funding will there be for the "comprehensive study" of depleted uranium exposure?
  • Which agencies and/or contractors will conduct the studies?
  • How will the outstanding data gaps be identified and how will study funds be prioritized and allocated?

Senator Cantwell identified some of the most important data gaps in her recent letter to Sec. Rumsfeld. If the McDermott-Shays amendment is passed in the Senate, my hope is that Sen. Cantwell's questions about depleted uranium will help guide the Department of Defense (DoD) in structuring a "comprehensive study." While I understand that many will view any DoD-sponsored study with great skepticism, I still think it's worth supporting the McDermott-Shays amendment. Any scientific study published on the long-term health effects of depleted uranium exposure will be rigorously critiqued by the scientific community, and we'll have the opportunity to press for adequate follow-up studies.

For those who care about the depleted uranium issue and want to support Rep. McDermott's amendment, I would recommend calling the offices of both of our senators. I believe both Sen. Murray and Sen. Cantwell are ready to support funding for a comprehensive depleted uranium study.  In the case of Sen. Cantwell, I would recommend first thanking her for taking a stand on depleted uranium here, and then asking her to support funding for a comprehensive depleted uranium study as part of the Senate version of the Defense Authorization bill.

With some strong support from the Washington delegation on this issue and with a little luck, perhaps we'll see the Congress finally require that the DoD sponsor the scientific studies we need to understand better the long-term consequences of using depleted uranium munitions. We owe it to the servicemembers who have put their lives and limbs on the line in Iraq, and we owe it to the Iraqi people themselves.

Here is Rep. McDermott's press release on the amendment:

House Passes Rep. McDermott Amendment

Possible DU Health Effects on Soldiers Will Be Studied

For Immediate Release, May 11, 2006

After years of relentless and unwavering efforts, including speeches, interviews, news conferences, working with groups like Physicians for Social Responsibility, and even appearing on a song in a newly released Punk Rock album, in order to raise public awareness, the House of Representatives today passed legislation (DoD Authorization) that includes an amendment by Rep. Jim McDermott (WA-D) ordering a comprehensive study on possible health effects from exposure to depleted uranium on U.S. soldiers and their children.

"As long and winding as the road has been to get where we are today, this is only the beginning- but this is a great day because we have taken the first step to defend the U.S. soldiers who protect and defend us," McDermott said.

Shortly after passage, Rep. McDermott received a letter from James King, the national executive director of AMVETS, the American Veterans organization:  

"This is a very important issue for AMVETS and its membership.  Our ultimate goal is to provide atomic veterans with the tools necessary to file a claim and be considered for due compensation. Your amendment will help begin this process.  

"Again, thank you for your amendment and your support of veterans and their families."  

Rep. McDermott has spent several years working to get the House to study DU.  He explained the reason behind his passionate advocacy for the issue in this way:

"For me, this is a personal, not political, quest.  My professional life turned from medicine to politics after my service in the U.S. Navy during the 1960s, when I treated combat soldiers returning from Vietnam.  

"Back then, the Pentagon denied that Agent Orange posed any danger to U.S. soldiers who were exposed.   Decades later, the truth finally emerged.  Agent Orange harmed our soldiers.  It made thousands sick and some died.   During all those years of denial, we stood by and did nothing while soldiers suffered.  No more Agent Orange!

"If DU poses no danger, we need to prove it with statistically valid, and independent scientific studies. If DU harms our soldiers, we all need to know it, and act quickly as any doctor would, to use all of our power to heal the sick.  We owe our soldiers a full measure of the truth, wherever that leads us."

The amendment to undertake a comprehensive study of possible health effects to soldiers from exposure to depleted uranium was contained in the Department of Defense Authorization Bill, which passed the House on Thursday evening.

Depleted uranium is a by-product of the uranium enrichment process.  Because it is very dense, the U.S. military uses DU for munitions like armor-piercing bullets and tank shells, and as a protective shield around tanks.  When used in munitions, DU pulverizes into a fine dust upon impact; it can hang in the air, be inhaled or seep into the soil.

During the Gulf War, the U.S. military used approximately 300 metric tons of DU as munitions.  To date in the Iraq War, approximately 150 metric tons have been used.  During conflicts in Bosnia, Kosovo, Serbia, and Montenegro, about 12 metric tons were used.  (A metric ton is slightly more than 2,200 pounds.)

In addition to its own use, the United States has provided or sold DU and DU munitions to several other nations.

-30-

Mike DeCesare

Communications Director

Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA)

Seattle:       206-553-7170

Fax:            206-553-7175

Cell:            509-954-9187

DC Office:  202-225-3106

Fax:            202-225-6197

1809 7th Avenue, Suite 1212

Seattle, WA 98101-1399

1035 Longworth Building

Washington, DC 20515


< Grays Harbor and Biodiesel | A boycott of One >
Display: Sort:
Is this something that's going to be of substantive help?

by noemie maxwell on Fri May 12, 2006 at 10:08:04 PM PST

* 1 none 0 *


happen, David.  Your involvement, careful research and helping the Senator to understand the significance. You've done a genuine humanitarian service, young David. It's an inspiration for me, this grandmother, to see young people like you
caring ... enough to get as actively involved as you've done with this issue.

On the Surge in Iraq "--we have set the bar so low it's buried in the sand at this point." - Barack Obama

by Lietta Ruger on Sat May 13, 2006 at 08:28:35 PM PST

* 7 none 0 *


In cleaning out my old DU files to make room for new files, I came across my copy of the March 29, 2000 GAO report on DU research and my copy of the summary report of RAND's 1999 report on DU research.

The GAO report neatly summarizes the RAND report's finding on the risks of exposure to aerosolized DU: "RAND concluded it would be virtually impossible to obtain enough inhaled or ingested depleted uranium to present a significant internal exposure."

Nonetheless, the GAO questioned DoD dose estimates for aerosolized DU in this way:

DOD estimates describing the extent of DU inhalation exposure of about 162 servicemembers who were in or on vehicles when they were struck by DU munitions in friendly fire incidents and for those entering the vehicles immediately after impact in the Gulf War are unreliable because of questionable assumptions used in the analysis. Reliable DU exposure estimates are important for assessing the potential for adverse health effects from exposure to DU and will augment the medical outcome data available from clinical monitoring of servicemembers involved in the friendly fire incidents.

The GAO's criticism of unreliable dose estimates was addressed in the so-called Capstone Study published in October 2004 as "Depleted Uranium Aerosol Doses and Risks." The GAO assumed that this study would "augment the medical outcome data available from clinical monitoring of servicemembers involved in the friendly fire incidents." However, that assumption has proven incorrect because the DoD has failed to implement the medical surveillance programs that would have generated the "medical outcome data" they refer to.

The DoD's failures do not end there, however. In the 1999 RAND report that was prepared for the DoD itself, RAND made series of recommendations for further research, which I summarize as follows:

  • Conduct long-term epidemiological studies.
  • Re-examine risk-assessment standards.
  • Research dose responses of DU on renal functions.
  • Examine mechanism by which DU exposures exert toxic effects in the body.
  • Expand the Baltimore VA study.
  • Study the effects of radiation on servicemembers in close proximity to DU weapons and armor.
  • Develop research protocols for the next wartime situation.
  • Conduct animal studies that simulate exposure to DU.

To what extent the DoD followed up on most of these recommendations I'm not qualified to say. However, I do note that the recommendation to conduct long-term epidemiological studies turned up again in the 2004 Capstone Study:

Conduct epidemiology studies on crewmembers with positive DU bioassay results. The primary data gap is the human health effects from acute exposures to DU aerosols. The recently implemented DU bioassay program (U.S. Army Medical Command 2004) could provide the exposure measurement data lacking in previous studies.

In a recent letter, Senator Cantwell has pressed Sec. Rumsfeld to explain to what extent the DoD has followed up on the recommendation to conduct these epidemiology studies. Dating back to RAND's 1999 report, the recommendation is now at least seven years old.

Beyond the DoD-sponsored studies, the "Iraqi Ministry of the Environment has asked the United Nations Environmental Program ("UNEP") to conduct an assessment of potential depleted uranium contamination in Iraq," as Senator Cantwell recently wrote in a second letter to Rumsfeld. Senator Cantwell has pointed out that the Pentagon has failed to respond to UNEP's request for information "regarding the use of depleted uranium munitions in Iraq."

Congress has plenty of reasons to pressure the DoD to confront the issue of the possible long-term health consequences of exposure to aerosolized DU. In its October 2005 report ("DU: Health and Public Health Issues Arising from the Use of Depleted Uranium Munitions"), Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) added one more: it's important to the Iraqi people. I will quote the PSR report at length:

Even when measured against the innumerable challenges facing Iraqi reconstruction, a public health response to the DU hazard is a priority activity. Such coordinated action will be essential to address the extensive use of DU in populated areas of Iraq, and the widespread belief held by large numbers of Iraqi citizens and health professionals that Americans have used radioactive weapons twice in Iraq, causing childhood cancers and birth defects. The Basra studies have been widely reported over the last three years in Iraqi media . . .

A public health response to DU in Iraq would include the following:

  1. Measurement of environmental levels of DU including surface water;
  2. Definition of potential routes of exposure;
  3. Definition of at-risk and susceptible populations, particularly children;

Development of appropriate surveillance systems:

Public health policy and program development should include:

  1. Efforts to reduce population exposures: fence off DU weapons use sites, post warning, clean-up contaminated sites;
  2. Assessment of populated exposures: check uranium in drinking water, offer urine uranium screening and other testing to potentially exposed groups;
  3. Improvements in the recognition and treatment of cancer, kidney disease, and birth defects.

The Precautionary Principle requires that Coalition Forces, now in conjunction with the Provisional Iraqi Government, accept responsibility for anticipating and preventing harm from DU to Iraqi citizens.

I would merely add that accepting "responsibility for anticipating and preventing harm from DU to Iraqi citizens" is something that extends to Congress and the American people for having allowed two President Bush's to use DU weaponry in two Iraq wars in fifteen years.

by DWE on Mon May 15, 2006 at 11:25:20 AM PST

* 8 none 0 *


I have just been informed that Sen. Cantwell will introduce a Senate version of Rep. McDermott's DU amendment. The exact date of the amendment depends on the legislative calendar. I will follow this up with details as I obtain them.

by DWE on Thu May 18, 2006 at 02:09:17 PM PST

* 9 none 0 *


Display: Sort:

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

 

 

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Related Links

+ letter
+ here
+ DWE's Diary

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News