Banning paid-per-signature has everything to do with fraudIn his attack on Rep. Sherry Appleton's bill to ban pay-per signature, blogger Stephan Sharkansky falls down the stairs:
Makes you wonder what he considers "serious evidence" because Oregon brought in criminal investigators to make their case. The Oregon law was upheld because the state was able to prove, unlike a similar ban in Colorado, that it prevented fraud. Andrew M. Gloger with the Initiative & Referendum Institute writes:
Read the entire report here (pdf file).
Banning paid-per-signature has everything to do with fraud | 0 comments ( topical)
|
Recommended Diaries
|