Washblog

Silence is where they hide their shame

"The entire burden of today's wars has been carried by a voluntary military force and its families. The larger public has not faced a draft, paid higher taxes or been asked to make any other sacrifice."

So how can a society that gets all tearful and weepy-eyed when somebody's house gets made-over remain silent, casual and disinterested unless the makeover team is working the house of a veteran?

How is it that the point of this editorial remains abstract so long as a draft doesn't drag the consumer-obsessed weepy-eyed who-rah flat-screen crowd into the same arena?

If you pay attention, you'll notice that those who publicly take stands supporting the troops by supporting the invasion and occupation as well as the wisdom-challenged foolish who started it are fewer and fewer every day.

You'll also notice that silence is where they hide their shame.

It's a silent majority apparently too shamed to do anything but sit, click and munch on Doritos.

 

New York Times Editorial

The Plight of American Veterans

Published: November 12, 2007

As an unpopular, ill-planned war in Iraq grinds on inconclusively, it can be a bleak time to be a veteran.

There is little outright hostility toward returning military personnel these days; few Americans are reviling them as "baby killers" or blaming them for a botched war of choice launched by the White House. Indeed, both Congress and the White House have been hymning their praises in the run-up to Veterans Day.

But all too often, soldiers who return from Iraq or Afghanistan - and those who served in Vietnam or Korea - have been left to fend for themselves with little help from the government.

Recent surveys have painted an appalling picture. Almost half a million of the nation's 24 million veterans were homeless at some point during 2006, and while only a few hundred from Iraq or Afghanistan have turned up homeless so far, aid groups are bracing themselves for a tsunamilike upsurge in coming years.

Tens of thousands of reservists and National Guard troops, whose jobs were supposedly protected while they were at war, were denied prompt re-employment upon their return or else lost seniority, pay and other benefits. Some 1.8 million veterans were unable to get care in veterans'; facilities in 2004 and lacked health insurance to pay for care elsewhere.

Meanwhile, veterans seeking disability payments faced huge backlogs and inordinate delays in getting claims and appeals processed.

The biggest stain this year was the scandalous neglect of outpatients at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center and a sluggish response to the needs of wounded soldiers at veterans clinics and hospitals.

Much of this neglect stemmed from the Bush administration's failure to plan for a long war with mounting casualties and over-long tours of duty to compensate for a shortage of troops.

Thus far, more than 4,000 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq or Afghanistan, many more than died in the almost-bloodless Persian Gulf war, but only a fraction of the body counts in Vietnam (58,000) or Korea (36,000). A higher percentage of wounded soldiers are surviving the current conflicts with grievous injuries, their lives saved by body armor, advances in battlefield medicine and prompt evacuation.

A study issued last week estimated that the long-term costs of their medical care and disability benefits could exceed the amount spent so far in prosecuting the war in Iraq.

To their credit, Congress and the administration have poured billions of added dollars into veterans' programs and streamlined procedures in a scramble to catch up with the need. That is only appropriate.

The entire burden of today's wars has been carried by a voluntary military force and its families. The larger public has not faced a draft, paid higher taxes or been asked to make any other sacrifice. The least a grateful nation should do is support the troops upon their return.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 (Fair Use), this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Washblog.com has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article.

"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.

 

< Clinton Campaign training will have a positive impact on the WA Democratic Party | Daily Astorian wins 2007 Dolly Connelly Award for series on climate change impact on Pacific NW >
Display: Sort:
"America" is not at war. Only our military and their families are.

by eridani on Mon Nov 12, 2007 at 03:26:35 PM PST

* 1 none 0 *


Quote ---- ""A higher percentage of wounded soldiers are surviving the current conflicts with grievous injuries, their lives saved by body armor, advances in battlefield medicine and prompt evacuation. ""

When my husband was activated with the Army Reserve for two years, I served as a Red Cross volunteer at Walter Reed.  I have many, many friends who are wives of wounded warriors, and here is a typical comment, especially from wives whose husbands were injured in
IED blasts:

"The man I loved and married died that day.  His brain injuries have destroyed his ability to be my husband, my partner. From that day on he will always be my dependent.  I am finding ways to love and live with this new person."

Very infrequently, in the most grievous situations, I hear a quiet "maybe it would have been better if he hadn't survivied...."

I argue that yes, body armor, swift medical evacuation and advanced medical care are keeping folks alive, but the "survival rate"  hides the true cost of this war to these service members and their families.  Something as simple as hearing loss can make a soldier's return to his first responder job back home impossible.....and disrupt an entire family's finacial stability.

For those of us with skin in the game, raising the awareness of caring yet uninformed citizens about what they can do to assist our veterans and their families should be JOB #1.

Some ideas:

  1.  Share your story with them.

  2.  Tell them about proposed legislation that needs their support. For priority legislation focused on service members, veterans and their families go to:  www.vmfp.org

  3.  Encourage them to adopt a military pen pal.  Once they connect with a service member one to one, they will see everything about this war differently.  Being a pen pal with a deployed service member is the quickest way to get "skin in the game". To be matched up with a service member requesting a pen pal go to: http://www.soldiersangels.com/.

Julie

by JulieTackett on Mon Nov 12, 2007 at 03:36:33 PM PST

* 2 none 0 *