Washblog

How the Sonics can matter more: Sell us (Part of) the Team

Back in Part 1: eridani said:

The Packers are owned by citizens of the town, and they give way more to their community than most professional sports teams. They don't even have professional cheerleaders--high school squads from all over Wisconsin take turns at that function.

chadlupkes said:

Sports teams and franchises are for-profit organizations, whose mission is to earn money for their ownership teams, not to provide a good cultural experience to the public.

When the Sonics go non-profit, or allow anyone to own stock and be a stakeholder WITH FINANCIAL RETURNS, then the situation will have changed.

Back in the mid-90s sports owners across the country were heading to their local governments, hat in hand, looking for money to build new stadiums. Many citizens looked at the pocket books of their owners and thought "Wouldn't it be great if we were more like the Green Bay Packers?"

The Packers, even though they're a for profit corporation the same as any for profit corporation, are unique in professionals sports because they offer stock to anyone who wants to come along. The sort of person who is most interested in buying Packers stock, is of course, a fan of the Packers. This model has kept a highly successful sports franchise in a community, that frankly, doesn't deserve one from the truly economic way of looking at the sport.

Even Green Bay's Wisconsin Big Brother, Milwaukee, has had trouble holding onto sports teams: the Hawks of the NBA and the Braves of MLB have all passed through and left Milwaukee in the time that the Packers have played. Turns out though that every other community interested in keeping an NBA, MLB, NFL or NHL team in town through some kind of corporate stock arrangement or non-profit ownership is pretty much out of luck. All four leagues outlaw non-profit ownership, with the NFL going as far as to ban any sort of corporate ownership, to prevent another Packers.

The New Rules Project points to several other non-traditional ownership models (in minor league baseball) and there are several non-profit examples in Canadian football (here, here and here).

New Rules also points to several legislative fixes that never actually came through during the high times of community ownership discussion in the late 90s. They go as far as condemning a sports franchise (in Minnsesota and New York) to simply building and running stadiums as a public agency, rather than handing them over to the teams (in Pennsylvania).

There are also examples of national legislation to rebalance the playing fields for locals: Sen. Paul Wellstone suggested removing baseball's anti-trust exemption in 2001 and Oregon's Rep. Earl Blumenauer sponsored the Give Fans a Chance Act, which would have opened the door for community's to bid on their teams. Rep. Adam Smith was one of the original co-sponsors of the bill.

Simply that the four major sports don't allow for ownership (that would tie a team to their community) is the most maddening part of this. Each league is exempt from anti-trust laws because their industry is not considered "commerce" by the courts, so they have the ability to ban non-profit ownership.

What I haven't pointed out yet is that the NBA does not ban corporate ownership, just non-profit ownership.

So, a Packers solution, a for profit company that sells stock on an individual basis, is technically possible here.

The problem is history. Green Bay has always been an individual stock company, from its origins. Its been when the team needed to raise money that they sold more stock.

Huh, that gives one me a thought. How would the Sonics feel if we told them that they could have all the money they wanted for a new arena if that money was raised by selling stock in a new ownership interest in the Sonics? We wouldn't buy the Sonics outright, just a portion. Just to get something back for our investment. The people would finance this particular improvement in the Sonics, but for every dollar we put into a new arena, we would also get a dollar in the ownership of the franchise.

I don't know why this wouldn't work.

< Anniversary Memorial Continues: Army Spc. Jonathan J. Santos and family | Terror entrepreneurs: undeserved benefits of doubts >
Display: Sort:
This is a more in-depth look at community ownership than the references I initially posted.  Sounds do-able to me.  At least the proposal moves the discussion off the plane of that silly sports fan vs. "Citizens for More Important Things" culture war nonsense.

by eridani on Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 08:59:15 PM PST

* 1 none 0 *


  • the jock quote by emmettoconnell, 03/25/2007 06:26:48 AM PST (none / 0)
pay for bailing out the sonics.

the things I've read about the crap the owner(s) have supported

let them use the u.s. gov't printing presses now in the possesion of halliburton.

rmm.

http://www.liemail.com/BambooGrassroots.html

by rmdSeaBos on Sat Mar 24, 2007 at 10:54:06 PM PST

* 2 none 0 *


Thanks, Emmett.  That's a much better articulation of what I was trying to say.

by chadlupkes on Wed Mar 28, 2007 at 06:48:20 AM PST

* 4 none 0 *


Display: Sort:
ROSSI'S BIGGEST CONTRIBUTOR
Skims $ Millions
from workers comp to attack Gregoire

CLICK IMAGE

 

 

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News