Washblog || Wa-Dems Won't Release Numbers?

Wa-Dems Won't Release Numbers?

By dlaw
Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 02:48:27 PM PST
Section: Diary Topic: Democrats

Kos et al, keep referring to the fact that some caucus states haven't released their popular vote numbers.

Why is Washington state on this list?

Washington caucus-goers showed up. Are they not to be counted in the national political debate about how many votes each candidate got?

Am I missing something?

< They Started With Clinton - And She Didn't Even Know | Marko Liias to Face Youthful Challenge >

Wa-Dems Won't Release Numbers? | 8 comments (8 topical)

Just as bad

They never posted the final counts for the precinct results. It got stuck at 96% reporting.

On The Road To 2008: Countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America

by Daniel K on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 12:08:40 AM PST

* 1 none 0 *

So Hillary Clinton Is Claiming Falsely... by dlaw, 04/24/2008 01:50:49 PM PST (none / 0)
Are we talking raw numbers of caucus attendees? by gibney, 04/24/2008 02:03:41 PM PST (none / 0)

sh! they'll see the big board!

heaven forbid anyone ...

nevermind.

Every chance the inside crowd gets to show that they're different and things are changing, they fuck it up.

didn't you know computers and blogs and email are organizing tools in the sense that it helps the up tops tell the down belows when to jump and how to jump, cuz that is what organizing is all about - having a bunch of mushrooms waiting around to get fed shit.

it is BEYOND comprehensioni why the numbers are NOT public and not VERY available, well,

unless you go to the paragraph above begining with "Every chance the inside crowd..."

rmm.

http://www.liemail.com/BambooGrassroots.html

by rmdSeaBos on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 10:41:21 AM PST

* 4 none 0 *

Poll Books by m3047, 04/28/2008 03:55:55 PM PST (none / 0)

Doesn'tmatter at the caucus level by gibney, 04/28/2008 10:29:12 PM PST (none / 0)

especially this year... by N in Seattle, 04/29/2008 09:15:08 AM PST (none / 0)

It's Sad: WA May Affect Indiana and even NC...

...the wrong way!

I saw Evan Bayh on TV last night touting Hillary's "popular vote" advantage.

so-called realclearpolitics.com, the source these idiotic numbers Clinton up only 12,000, including her 330,000-to-0 "victory" in Michigan, the Florida vote and their "estimates" for IA, NV, ME and WA.

It seems to me that given where Obama won and the extraordinary turnout in those districts relative even to their Democratic performance, Washington state alone could belie Senator Clinton's insanely inflated claim.

Dems in our state showed up in huge numbers and stated their extraordinarily clear preference. Wa-Dems could, it seems to me, make the case before the next primary that Clinton is not telling the truth about this.

by dlaw on Tue Apr 29, 2008 at 10:11:55 PM PST

* 8 none 0 *

Wa-Dems Won't Release Numbers? | 8 comments (8 topical)

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST