Why Initiative 26 is Bad News
By zappini
Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 05:01:17 PM PST
Section: King County
Topic: Election news/info
I utterly oppose Initiative 26. From its
website:
King County Initiative 26 would make the offices of King County Executive, King County Assessor, and King County Council Non-partisan. This allows voters to choose between all candidates in the primary without having to "pick-a-party," while making county government accountable to the people, not political parties.
Nice spin. With non-partisan races, meaning candidates won't have party support, only well-funded candidates win be able to win local office. And that means Republican candidates, in fact, if not in name.
More...
The spin for I-26 sounds progressive. But the effect will be very regressive.
I fully support the goals of government being accountable to the voters, of government representing the people faithfully, of increasing competition for elected office.
Fortunately, we already have the correct answer: publicly funded campaigns. If you want better government, support Washington Public Campaigns.
This doesn't address the inherit problems with our current "winner takes all" elections. But that's a discussion for another day.
In a rare moment of lucidity, Josh Feit posted concurring opinion "Non-Partisan My Ass" to Slog, with much better background info, exposing three big funders of I-26 as crony capitalists.
Because I can't resist...
If King County Councilmember Pete von Reichbauer no longer wants to run as a Republican in the increasingly Democratic 7th district, I humbly suggest that perhaps he switch parties. Maybe as an Independent. Or even switch back to being a Democrat.
Having said all that...
I do think that some races should be non-partisan. Auditor, Sheriff, Treasurer, Prosecutor. Roles which are elected, but where the office holder is expected to be utterly fair and impartial.