Washblog

On Brian Baird and Republican Demands for an Apology

The local Republican Party published an article in the Pacific County Press in which they demand an apology from Brian Baird for his remarks about disrupted town meetings with " lynch-mob and brown shirt tactics."

Most who have read my writings over the years understand that I am for the most part an opinionated old guy with a tendency to make no apologies. Contrary to the opinion of certain American traitors who've worked hard to convince America that "liberal" is a dirty word - unpatriotic, dangerous, despicable, or socialistic, I remain willing to advocate for liberal as well as conservative positions in which I believe.

After the last two election cycles, I backed away from lots of writing. At 63, I want to retire as soon as possible from my full-time job at the local welfare office in South Bend. 


That's right, the welfare office - where a day doesn't go by without older American residents of our county coming in seeking any kind of relief from medical expenses that take larger and larger bites out of their fixed income. 

It's also the office where younger Americans come in - not asking for a welfare check - but to find out if there's any kind of help with medical expenses. They don't want a government hand out. They seek a way to keep their families safe. And they are not seeing or hearing any constructive ideas from reform opponents, especially the current minority party, it's willfully propagandistic leadership and its public broadcast shills who are all talk and no solution.

I may not be the county expert on health care reform, but I'm willing to bet that short of medical professionals, I see the problem more closely and with more clarity than most citizens nationwide who have gone to town meetings scared, worried and nervous. They seem to feel that way because they are driven by outrage and fear inspired by the disinformation and outright lying that has come out of desperate Republican political organizing, coaching and talking point tactics.

That those outraged are constituents same as me is not something I challenge. I expect them to attend the meetings. But if they come to just constantly rant in a loud voice with pointing fingers while offering nothing else and stopping everyone else from participating, I take exception.

I'm impressed with original thoughts. Anyone who knows me will tell you I'm old, slow and gab a lot, but I know a purpose-driven talking point when I hear one and immediately grab my wallet.

I also read a lot and look stuff up when I stumble into something interesting or scary. If we get scared or worried, that last thing we should do is lazily let someone else tell us, "Don't think. I'll tell you what to think."

But that's what we are seeing. I don't need talking points from Keith Olbermann any more than we need words pronounced with pretended wisdom by Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity.

As for Brian Baird, this excellent US Representative does not owe anyone in the 3rd Congressional District an apology unless he has personally insulted or sullied a specific individual by name. To my knowledge he has done nothing of the kind. 

I also suggest that Nansen Malin, Pacific County Republican Party Chairwoman and Republican 3rd District Co-Chair owes all voters in the 3rd District an apology for assuming that we are stupid and gullible. Nansen should be ashamed for trying to BS young and old voters who aren't going to keep buying the current lemon no matter how often you change the tires and repaint the fenders.

Let me share something personal with you. If I stopped working at the welfare office today, my monthly medical insurance payment to cover my wife and me would be over $920 per month. That's where we have come over the past decades for not giving a damn about economic politics on the national level.

So leaving employment with a mortgage coupled with almost $1000 a month allocated to free market medical capitalism is the best we can do for each other in this country?

Do I owe it to my doctor who chose his vocation based on the assumptions of not merely making a living, but a living that buys a house that overlooks Willapa Bay with a mortgage possibly double the size of my monthly income? Is granting him his wish while quietly and without protest spending all of my pension on my own shelter and medical expense somehow showing patriotic and civic consideration for the economic realities of economic health care capitalism?

Do I buy into the idea that my $900-per-month extorting insurance company can rob me as a reasonable and undisputed right to economic profit in any or every area of life?

There are those who try to say that it's not that simple.

I disagree, the solution IS that simple. What makes people step away from it is that it can be hard and ugly - well an ugly and hurting hardship to those least vulnerable by virtue of income or prosperity that is based on health care as a commodity.

If we can see health care as a commodity, can we agree that defense is a commodity since the intent is also citizen safety and well being? Can we then agree to stop that sort of government spending and subsidy on weaponry, systems and personnel that is done outside the norms of free-market competitive capitalism?

What about our recent historical decisions to consider the need for other public necessities and well being as commodities? Deregulation ... how has that worked out for us?

This is where we've arrived with our stupid ignoring of and allowing the evolution of the non-democratic notion that health care is a commodity; that business has a right to put a price tag on health care and offer it only to those who can pay.

So we are capitalists and don't understand that health care is not the same as access to the cars for which we paid the going market value years ago and in many cases will drive around until they are too broken down to run anymore.

If health care is a commodity, will we have to shop around for used health care because we can't afford the newest market version?

If we shift gears, alter our basic assumptions about what is the best and most effective definition of common good, who will be hurt by backing away from corporate capitalism and moving into universal health care, universal education, and adequate universal housing for all citizens?

The lobbyists may lose their jobs. But then they might be grateful that the thousand dollars or so that they have to pay from their possibly smaller incomes will no longer be an expense their new job has to cover.

Health care and insurance workers may lose their jobs and have to look somewhere else to provide for their families. Was that ever a concern to corporate capitalist sociopaths who laid off workers and destroyed pension funds with impunity?

I'd rather we have to find ways to help unemployed former health care workers find work than keep dumping over half my retirement into a system that doesn't care for us at all.

Lies and noise aren't going to help us and that's all I can see from political opposition to health care reform.  I think we will better take care of each other by telling the reformers not to back down.

< Too Poor to Get the Groceries Home? | Baird Gets Death Threats, GOP Slams Baird >
Display: Sort:
in calling these Brownshirt tactics -- he's historically on-point, cause that's what the Brownshirts did.

$920 per month for insurance.  Oh man.  

I think you're right that where things are headed is that the powerful want everything to be market-based, including school, including the military.  This is a push toward fascism for the profit of a few.  It's evil.

by noemie maxwell on Tue Aug 18, 2009 at 07:31:41 AM PST

* 1 none 0 *


Hi Arthur.

Thank you for your post. Great stuff. And thank you for your work. You're earning your angel wings for sure.

You're not fooling anyone. We all know you're just a big teddy bear.  I've got the pictures to prove it. Your strongly held opinions come from your experience, not any personality issues.

Capitalism is just a way to allocate finite resources. Nothing more. No ideology required. And, by the way, I think capitalism is great. (Now if we could just find some...)

Free markets, trickle down economics, supply side economics, etc., are just code words for theft, cronyism, oligarchy, and feudalism.

A very small fraction of our economy is conducted via open markets. Something like 10-15%. Most trade is done between business units, etc.

That in no way diminishes the role of open markets. Well designed markets are crucial for establishing the value (price) of stuff. So even if I'm buying widgets from a business partner, I have a pretty good idea what those widgets should cost.

That's the brilliant part of the progressive position in this healthcare reform debate: We know we're getting screwed. As individuals and as a society, we're not getting our money's worth. We have a dozen similar systems for comparison, including our very own Medicare. So we can see, plain as day, that we're spending more and getting less. Such is the beauty of comparison shopping.

Further, there needs to be no apology for treating human well being as a public good. Do we charge individuals for the air they breathe, the fire station down the street, or the public schools? No, those costs are born by society at large. It's recognized that we all benefit. And by pooling our resources, we get more bang for the buck.

Even with universal health care, goods and services are still bought and sold. Clinics need buildings. Patients need drugs. Etc.

With healthcare reform, our currently rigged game gets a few corrections, which will remove the perverse incentives to profit off people's sickness rather than their well being.

by zappini on Wed Aug 19, 2009 at 09:26:22 AM PST

* 2 none 0 *


Remember Danny Aines, the basketball player? I hated watching him play. Every single time he got called on a foul, he'd act as though he lived completely without sin and was thoroughly outraged -- outraged! -- that a ref would dare question his humanity. Meanwhile, Aines was as meanspirited and conniving as just about everyone else on the court.

That's how these few remaining Republicans act. It sickens me.

Apologizing to these antisocialists would prove their point: liberals are weak and lack conviction.

No apology necessary.

by zappini on Wed Aug 19, 2009 at 09:31:29 AM PST

* 3 none 0 *


I read that Baird's townhalls will be televised.

Thinking about it, that's absolutely brilliant. Every single one of these meetings should be on TV.

Let the country see these antisocialist thugs and dingbats live and unedited.

Edward R. Murrow allowed Joseph McCarthy to defeat himself. All Murrow had to do is run the tape.

Predictably, healthcare reform got the swiftboat treatment. It's pretty clear the Democrats are never going to get their act together on messaging (aka PR, propaganda).

Fear and outrage are immediate reactions. The hotter it burns, the quicker it burns. It allows the antisocialists to dominate the daily news cycle and manufacture outrage and controversy.

Fortunately, there's an antidote to mob rule: extend the debate.  

The longer we talk about healthcare reform, the better we'll do. Reason, reflection, debunking, and deliberation take time. And during that time, let the crazies undo themselves with their psychosis.

by zappini on Wed Aug 19, 2009 at 09:40:15 AM PST

* 4 none 0 *


Display: Sort:

 

 

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News