Washblog

(re)Agonizing the Defeat of Prop 1

They're still kicking the Prop 1 dead horse over on Horse's Ass. Lee writes:

I can't even begin to understand what the hell the Sierra Club was thinking when they actually convinced themselves that siding with Kemper Freeman to kill this plan would somehow lead to less roads (and therefore less global warming, as their "logic" went).

We left-wing opponents didn't side with Kemper Freeman Jr. We opposed a bad plan. Unclear scope of work. Unending taxing authority. Regressive taxation. Starting work that'd need more funding to finish.

Sorry, but no thank you.

That Kemper agreed with us just shows that even a stopped watch is right twice daily.

The problem is that the roads are going to be built no matter what...

Fine. But why should I have to pay for them? It's like buying an alcoholic a six-pack and pleading "This is it. After this, no more. It's time for you to start acting reasonable. Okay?" Classic enabling behavior. What's required here is some tough love.

Seattle is the tax base for the region, for the state. We already subsidize most everyone else's standard of living (both the eastside and Eastside). We enable the sprawl.

Most rural and suburban dwellers think they carry us. It's an amazing, shocking amount of ignorance.

Our reward for this largess?

They hate us liberals.

I say fine, cool by me. The rest of the state can pay for their own roads (and ferries).

You want to drive your gas guzzlers? Fine. Knock yourself out. Gas prices will continue to rise. This, ultimately, will be a self-correcting problem. You want to rot in traffic and be a stranger to your family so that you can have two acres and a mule? Fine. That's your choice.

I used to be a utopian. For social justice, economic, and environmental reasons. Public transit for the masses. And happy to pay for it.

Now I'm selfish. I'll support any plan that directly and solely benefits Seattle. I'll support any plan where the partner meets Seattle as a good faith negotiator. For instance, if the Eastside wants to build their rail to our city limit for a link up.

In fact, everywhere else can do whatever they want, just so long as I don't have to pay for it.

Meanwhile, Seattle will continue to build ever more urban housing. People will vote with their feet. They'll choose to work where they live. They'll choose healthy lifestyles over long commutes. That's the open market at work. And the employers will have to follow.

What scares me the most about how the Sierra Club, and certain other anti-roads folks, approached this issue is that it was eerily reminiscent of the neocon mindset.

I don't even know what to make of this. It's like a new form of Godwin's Law. Agree with me or I'll call you names. How petulant.

There's a lyric that applies, from the Sneaker Pimps (I think):

Just because I understand doesn't mean I care.

We left-wing opponents get it. We're just no longer willing to forfeit a kidney on the hopes that someone else gets out of their car.

In general, I have some advice for proponents for public and mass transit:


  • First, neutralize or buyoff the beneficiaries of sprawl. Like Quadrant, Behring and Kemper. They'll always scuttle any plan which threatens their racket.

  • Second, address the root causes of the problem: urban areas subsidizing sprawl and land use codes.

  • Third, first a little, then a lot. Make the projects modest. Incrementally improve the image of civic works. Small stuff, like how the design/build team for I-90 was given financial incentives for being on time and under budget.

  • Lastly, and this will be the hardest one for everyone to accept, top-down centralized solutions no longer work. Sorry. This is the 3rd millennium. You'll have to find new innovative strategies.

That's all.

< Hate Will Not Live Here | Facing up to Stop Loss; it can't hold - it isn't holding. Put this topic into Presidential Debates >
Display: Sort:
I agree, zappini, that there's no call for people to judge each other for their decisions on this.

I supported Prop 1.  I voted for it. I am disappointed it didn't pass.

And I wish it had not been put to a vote of the people.  

For 3 years people on all sides of the transportation issue worked together for the best compromises they could find that would address all the most pressing needs.  Many of these people were immersed in these issues.  Frankly, they know a hell of a lot more than I do -- just stepping in now.  

And, being forced to work together, they were not making decisions on the basis that I know many of my neighbors were: 'but do I get a new bus line in my neighborhood?'

Prop 1 involved momentous & incredibly complicated issues of transportation, finance, governance, climate change, etc.  I read quite a bit on it, spent quite a bit of time thinking about it, and never got my mind around a context that could help me constructively understand all the little pieces of it.  I'd planned to write a series of supportive posts on it -- but found that the deeper I got, the more questions I had.  

I think that this issue is too complicated for voters to decide on.  At the very least, only people who took a class on it -- and committed to the process of understanding some of the many issues and tradeoffs involved -- should have been allowed to vote on it.  I'm not joking here -- there are models for this kind of decision-making, citizen councils where people without a stake are brought into an intensive process of learning about an issue to come to a decision.  

As for the roads part of this...

There was comparatively little roadbuilding proposed in terms of new miles of roads in this package.  Much of that part of the package would have accomplished much needed efficiencies like hooking up the fast lanes on different highways so that people would no longer have to get out of the fast lane on 167 N, for example, switch over to the slow lane on 405 S, and then switch back to the fast lane.  What a waste!  And speaking of climate change -- what a contributor to that.

There's no way that we can throw up our hands and say we can no longer invest in roads because of climate change.

Washington is one state.  Urban and rural, we're in this together.  So I don't buy that there should be segmentation of roads and transit, urban and rural, tough love, etc.  We've got to figure this out together -- in a practical, problem-solving way that respects everyone's differences of opinion and situation.  

I'm really sad that Prop 1 didn't pass. But perhaps something good will come of it.

 

by noemie maxwell on Sun Nov 18, 2007 at 01:01:05 PM PST

* 1 none 0 *


  • Thoughts by zappini, 11/21/2007 09:24:29 AM PST (none / 0)
  • Alternatives by zappini, 11/21/2007 10:02:41 AM PST (none / 0)
Display: Sort:

 

 

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News