On Distractions, Or, If You Hide In A Smoke Screen, Make Sure It's Not Toxic
It has been an extraordinarily bad week for John McCain, what with his interest in Sarah Palin’s boobs apparently keeping him from being sufficiently aware of the “fundamental soundness” of the economy...but luckily for McCain, the news cycle turns; and a hotel bombing in Pakistan might be the opening his campaign thinks it needs.
With that in mind, expect the next week leading up to Friday’s Presidential debate to be full of references to McCain’s favorite subject...“the transcendent challenge of our time—Islamofascism”...or something eerily similar. His campaign is convinced this is the strongest place for him to make his argument for election—but what if it is not?
As we anticipate what is coming next from McCain, let’s remind ourselves just how much of a foreign policy expert McCain really is—and let’s do it using McCain’s own words.
McCain likes to talk about how he was the most vocal critic of the war...until January 2007, when Mr. Bush finally listened to McCain and adopted The Surge.
It’s a great story...and if it were true it would be even better.
“...I’ll teach you to kick me!” Now I’m not as expert-y as John McCain, but here’s what I told my friends before the war started: Try to imagine if the UK decided that our government had gone completely crazy, and that for our own good we needed their troops to remove our government and temporarily occupy the US until we could get ourselves back on the right track. No matter how crazy our government had actually become, the instant that news was broadcast in this country it would become the biggest hunting season you ever saw on the beaches of New England, with millions of heavily armed Americans converging on the invading forces. What makes you think Iraqis would act any differently? McCain, the expert, was certain that Iraqis wouldn’t even fight...and he obviously never expected an insurgency:
"Look, we're going to send young men and women in harm's way and that's always a great danger, but I cannot believe that there is an Iraqi soldier who is going to be willing to die for Saddam Hussein, particularly since he will know that our objective is to remove Saddam Hussein from power." The guy who was supposedly such a critic of the war was also one of the co-sponsors of the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) that got the war started in October of 2002. And although he denies it now, during the runup to the war he wasn’t complaining about the number of troops to be deployed:
"But the fact is, I think we could go in with much smaller numbers than we had to do in the past. But any military man worth his salt is going to have to prepare for any contingency, but I don't believe it's going to be nearly the size and scope that it was in 1991." When Robert Byrd questioned the logic of the war on the floor of the Senate, McCain rose to respond: "...when the people of Iraq are liberated, we will again have written another chapter in the glorious history of the United States of America." McCain was also very comfortable with how things were going...at first:
"I have no qualms about our strategic plans. I thought we were very successful in Afghanistan..." When questioned, McCain even defended the propriety of the “Mission Accomplished” banner on the June 11, 2003 edition of Fox News’ Your World With Neil Cavuto:
NEIL CAVUTO: Senator -- after a conflict means after the conflict, and many argue the conflict isn't over. Later in 2003, despite being a self-described critic of the war, he remained certain we were on the right track:
“Let there be no doubt: victory can be our only exit strategy. We are winning in Iraq.”
Al-Qaeda supporters are Sunni; Iranians are predominantly Shi’a. I know that, you probably know that, Joe Lieberman knows that...but for some reason John McCain...the foreign policy expert...can’t seem to remember which is which...and now he doesn’t have Lieberman standing at his shoulder to set him straight. Of course, we are told, that was just a “senior moment”.
“...The last man nearly ruined this place, One way to be right about an issue is to take both sides of the same argument; and this is a technique McCain employs on a regular basis. An example? McCain was confident in the Bush Administration’s team in September of 2004...
"I think he [President Bush] strengthened our national defenses. I think he has a good team around him." ...but three months later, describing his feelings about then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on MSNBC, McCain gave this assessment:
"I said no. My answer is still no. No confidence." You may recall McCain said we could stay in Iraq for a hundred years...but you may not recall that in February of 2003, roughly a month before we went in, he said we can’t—and he said it as a way to justify the invasion:
"We cannot keep our forces indefinitely staged in the region. Were we to attempt again to contain Saddam, we would eventually have to withdraw them. The world is full of dangers and, more likely than not, we will need some of those brave men and women to face them down." You used to be able to see the original quote on John McCain’s Senate website...but for some reason the record is today “inaccessible”. (Big thanks to the PERRspectives Blog for grabbing the quote.) And for those who think McCain might finally have his diplomatic act together...ummmm...despite his saying he knows the leaders of Latin America (and that Obama doesn’t), Spain is not Venezuela, it is not in Latin America—and they’re our friends. Let’s sum all this up: It is more likely than not that McCain will attempt to use the Pakistan bombing this week to position himself as the candidate who has the judgment required to keep America safe from “noun, verb, transcendent challenge”. This is an opportunity for us, however, to remind voters that the real McCain record has not been one that inspires confidence in his leadership...that he really doesn’t know what he’s talking about much of the time...and that we can’t afford another 50 years of this, or a hundred—or a million. McCain will take jabs at the truth this week...and it is our job to meet those jabs with parries of our own—and then to follow up with counterstrikes of reality, using his own record to knock back his attacks. Now get out there, Gentle Reader...and let’s win this thing.
On Distractions, Or, If You Hide In A Smoke Screen, Make Sure It's Not Toxic | 1 comment (1 topical)
On Distractions, Or, If You Hide In A Smoke Screen, Make Sure It's Not Toxic | 1 comment (1 topical)
|
|
Recommended Diaries
Recent Diaries
Prague Hotels
By anson28jan (0 comments)
Murray and Cantwell for the Win?
By dlaw (1 comments)
Does Senator Cantwell Think We'll Forget?
By dlaw (14 comments)
Help our state representatives figure it out
By leduc (0 comments)
Murray, Cantwell, Public Option
By dlaw (6 comments)
FUSE: When is the First Time U Got My EM?
By m3047 (0 comments)
Group Health Seriuosly Flawed
By SME in Seattle (0 comments)
Can someone find me a progressive to take on Murray
By leduc (18 comments)
Farrakhan v. Gregoire: The Wrong Debate
By sarge (2 comments)
When will Washington go Single Payer?
By Pen (4 comments)
Why Democrats Must Join The "Tea Party"
By dlaw (2 comments)
Why do Republicans Oppose Fair Elections?
By Pen (0 comments)
Progressive Party Supports Better Tax Revenues
By Linde Knighton (10 comments)
business
By dannydemichele2 (0 comments) Related Links+ boobs+ Duck Soup + Face the Nation + critic + co-sponsor s + Face the Nation [2] + questioned + he wrote + ABC + defended + Mission Accomplished + speaking + set him straight + senior moment + Duck Soup [2] + John McCain + PERRspecti ves Blog + saying he knows + fake consultant's Diary Washblog RSS FeedsPolitical ContactsLocal MediaAberdeen Daily World Chinook Observer Montesano Vidette Pacific County Press Willapa Harbor Herald KXRO 1320 AM Peninsula Daily News Bremerton Sun Bremerton Chronicle Gig Harbor Gateway Port Orchard Independent Port Townsend Leader North Kitsap Herald Squim Gazette Central Kitsap Reporter Business Examiner KONP 1450 AM Anacortes American Bainbridge Review Voice Of Bainbridge San Juan Journal The Islands' Sounder Whidbey NewsTimes South Whidbey Record Stanwood/Camano News Vashon Beachcomber Voice Of Vashon KLKI 1340 AM Bellingham Herald The Northern Light Everett Herald Skagit Valley Herald Lynden Tribune The Enterprise Snohomish County Tribune Snohomish County Business Journal The Monroe Monitor The Edmonds Beacon KGMI 790 AM KELA 1470 AM KRKO 1380 AM King County Journal Issaquah Press Mukilteo Beacon Voice of the Valley Federal Way Mirror Bothell/Kenmore Reporter Kirkland courier Mercer Island Reporter Woodinville Weekly Seattle PI Seattle Times KOMO TV 4 KIRO TV 7 KING 5 TV KTBW TV 22 KCTS 9 UW Daily The Stranger Seattle Weekly Capitol Hill Times Madison Park Times Seattle Journal of Commerce NW Asian Weekly West Seattle Herald North Seattle Herald-Outlook South Seattle Star Magnolia News Beacon Hill News KIRO 710 AM KOMO AM 1000 KEXP 90.3 FM KUOW 94.9 FM KVI 570 AM The Columbian Longview Daily News Nisqually Valley News Lewis County News The Reflector Eatonville Dispatch Tacoma News Tribune Tacoma Weekly Puyallup Herald Enumclaw Courier-Herald The Olympian KAOS 89.3 FM KCPQ 13 KOWA FM 106.5 UPN 11 Ellensburg Daily Record Levenworth Echo Cle Elum Tribune Snoqualmie Valley Record Methow Valley News Lake Chelan Mirror Omak chronicle The Newport Miner The Spokesman-Review KREM 2 TV Spokane KXLY News 4 Spokane KHQ 6 Spokane KSPS Spokane Statesman-Examiner Othello Outlook Cheney Free Press Camas PostRecord The South County sun White Salmon Enterprise Palouse Boomerang Columbia Basin Herald Grand Coulee Star Walla Walla Union-Bulletin Yakima Herald-Republic KIMA 29 Yakima KAPP TV 35 Yakima KYVE Yakima Wenatchee World Tri-City Herald TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities KTNW Richland KEPR 19 Pasco Daily Sun News Prosser Record-Bulletin KTCR 1340 AM KWSU Pullman Moscow-Pullman Daily News |