Washblog

Providing Unneccessary Cover?

In an interesting case of how Democrats and Progressives seem to keep getting our messages crossed, Stilwell over at the Northwest Progressive Institute Official Blog has, in my opinion, completely mis-fired over the January 12, 2007 editorial over at the Seattle Times

In his post, "Twisted into Pretzels," Stilwell takes the Times to task for challenging the new Democratic majority to act rather than stand on grand "gestures" of protest over Bush's proposed escalation of the mess in the Middle East. In response to the Times' admonition that,


" Political arm-waving and high-profile votes on nonbinding resolutions and other artfully worded parliamentary expressions of opposition are worthless. They do not inform the public about the nature of the president's military escalations, and more importantly they do nothing to turn off the flow of dollars that keep the administration's disastrous mission alive." he says, "That's rich. That stupid Constitution and all, you know. And I wonder who would be the first to excoriate Democrats should they field a resolution that doesn't pass Constitutional muster?"


Needless to say, I am totally onboard with the Times on this matter. As one who soundly criticized their endorsement of GW in 2000 and their complicity in the build up to the Iraq debacle in the first place, I have watched with keen interest their evolution toward their current "out of Iraq" editorial policy. As if pre-emptively addressing Stilwell's concern about things not passing "Constitutional muster", the editorial in question says,


" Parsing out a role for the congressional power of the purse will not be easy. No one wants to undercut the military men and women already in the field, and on organizational and financial levels, the president's call for more troops blends new units and extends others. If it is complicated to mulch through the budget process, well, too bad. Get to work." It's almost as if Stilwell is setting up an escape clause for Democrats who do not want to confront the task before them. The copy of the Constitution that I use (apparently it's like the bible - everyone has their own interpretation) it is indeed the congress that has the authority to assemble and regulate the armed forces and it is certainly the duty of the congress to appropriate the monies for such purposes.


Let there be no mistake, this is no time to let the Democrats off the hook over this vital responsibility. As put forward by the Times,


" Democrats were elected to confront the president's grievous war. They are not allowed a news cycle of snappy quotes only to plead legislative complexity in confronting the financial mechanisms that extend the war."


Progressives should not be divided over this issue. Rather, we should be leading the charge to help our newly elected majority do the job they were sent there to do.


Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue

< Stealing Farmlands in Snohomish County | Federal Way School Board Bans Al Gore's Movie >
Display: Sort:
One aspect of it is that this administration still claims, to the best of my knowledge, that the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional.

So I can easily envision a situation where Democrats pass something, and the administration claims the power of the "unitary executive."

Now, whether it will come to that, I don't know. But obviously I have a substantially different (and more cynical) view than you of the Times motivations here. As I mentioned in my post, they let Dave Reichert off the hook on this and during the campaign they let Mike McGavick off the hook too.

The horns of the dilemna are that we can't cut off money for "troops in the field," of course. Or at least that's how I see it.

I'm not "setting up an escape clause" for Democrats, Chad, I'm trying to figure out how this will work, both politically and legally. Our entire Democratic delegation is pretty united on this and has been pretty clear in its negative reaction to the escalation, so I saw The Times editorial as just another case of them using a double standard against Democrats.

Peace to you too, Chad.

Jon DeVore
aka stilwell

by Jon DeVore on Fri Jan 12, 2007 at 02:43:50 PM PST

* 1 none 0 *


I am reading with great interest the exchange here and what looks to me like authentic dialogue on what Congress can and cannot do constitutionally; the immediate funding impact on our deployed troops and de-funding the continuation of Iraq war via escalation; the long term question of escalation to extend to Iran.

Thanks to those of you for sharing and your courage in expressing your thoughts, less the usual blinded by partisan loyalty rhetoric. For myself, I am not at all convinced that the newly elected Democratic majority will be the hoped for 'saviors' using the power of the purse imbued to them in winning the majority. I also don't want to use stock rhetoric attriburted to the 'peace movement' at this critical time.  I'm reflecting carefully on the situation.  Which is why I am appreciating the discussion and valuing the authentic efforts in this thread.  

'Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? ~ Abraham Lincoln

by Lietta Ruger on Sat Jan 13, 2007 at 10:35:53 AM PST

* 5 none 0 *


Display: Sort:

 

 

 

PNW TOPIC HOTLIST

Login

Make a new account
Username:
Password:

 HELP

Recommended Diaries

Washblog RSS Feeds

Political Contacts

Local Media

Coastal/Grays Harbor
Aberdeen Daily World
Chinook Observer
Montesano Vidette
Pacific County Press
Willapa Harbor Herald
KXRO 1320 AM

Olympic Peninsula
Peninsula Daily News
Bremerton Sun
Bremerton Chronicle
Gig Harbor Gateway
Port Orchard Independent
Port Townsend Leader
North Kitsap Herald
Squim Gazette
Central Kitsap Reporter
Business Examiner
KONP 1450 AM

Sound and Islands
Anacortes American
Bainbridge Review
Voice Of Bainbridge
San Juan Journal
The Islands' Sounder
Whidbey NewsTimes
South Whidbey Record
Stanwood/Camano News
Vashon Beachcomber
Voice Of Vashon
KLKI 1340 AM

North Puget Sound
Bellingham Herald
The Northern Light
Everett Herald
Skagit Valley Herald
Lynden Tribune
The Enterprise
Snohomish County Tribune
Snohomish County Business Journal
The Monroe Monitor
The Edmonds Beacon
KGMI 790 AM
KELA 1470 AM
KRKO 1380 AM

Central Puget Sound
King County Journal
Issaquah Press
Mukilteo Beacon
Voice of the Valley
Federal Way Mirror
Bothell/Kenmore Reporter
Kirkland courier
Mercer Island Reporter
Woodinville Weekly

Greater Seattle
Seattle PI
Seattle Times
KOMO TV 4
KIRO TV 7
KING 5 TV
KTBW TV 22
KCTS 9
UW Daily
The Stranger
Seattle Weekly
Capitol Hill Times
Madison Park Times
Seattle Journal of Commerce
NW Asian Weekly
West Seattle Herald
North Seattle Herald-Outlook
South Seattle Star
Magnolia News
Beacon Hill News
KIRO 710 AM
KOMO AM 1000
KEXP 90.3 FM
KUOW 94.9 FM
KVI 570 AM

South Puget Sound
The Columbian
Longview Daily News
Nisqually Valley News
Lewis County News
The Reflector
Eatonville Dispatch
Tacoma News Tribune
Tacoma Weekly
Puyallup Herald
Enumclaw Courier-Herald
The Olympian
KAOS 89.3 FM
KCPQ 13
KOWA FM 106.5
UPN 11

Cascade/Okanogan
Ellensburg Daily Record
Levenworth Echo
Cle Elum Tribune
Snoqualmie Valley Record
Methow Valley News
Lake Chelan Mirror
Omak chronicle
The Newport Miner

Spokane/Palouse
The Spokesman-Review
KREM 2 TV Spokane
KXLY News 4 Spokane
KHQ 6 Spokane
KSPS Spokane
Statesman-Examiner
Othello Outlook
Cheney Free Press
Camas PostRecord
The South County sun
White Salmon Enterprise
Palouse Boomerang
Columbia Basin Herald
Grand Coulee Star
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Yakima Herald-Republic
KIMA 29 Yakima
KAPP TV 35 Yakima
KYVE Yakima
Wenatchee World
Tri-City Herald
TVEW TV 42 Tri-cities
KTNW Richland
KEPR 19 Pasco
Daily Sun News
Prosser Record-Bulletin
KTCR 1340 AM
KWSU Pullman
Moscow-Pullman Daily News