Washblog

Apparently, while the media is busy anointing "front runners" based upon "possible" and "likely" caucus voters or some straw poll taken at some county fair or clam bake, they seem to completely ignore the offsetting negatives for each of the candidates. I think the information is very interesting:

The online survey of 9,718 likely voters nationwide, conducted Oct. 11-15, 2007, asked the question, "Whom would you NEVER vote for for President of the U.S.?"

Clinton (D) 50%
Kucinich (D) 49%
Gravel (D) 47%
Paul (R) 47%
Brownback (R) 47%
Tancredo (R) 46%
McCain (R) 45%
Hunter (R) 44%
Giuliani (R) 43%
Romney (R) 42%
Edwards (D) 42%
Thompson (R) 41%
Dodd (D) 41%
Biden (D) 40%
Obama (D) 37%
Huckabee (R) 35%
Richardson (D) 34%
Not sure 4%

Now anyone who knows me knows that I am no rocket scientist but I think there may be something here. Let's just assume for a minute that no one has voted yet in any caucus or primary and that the assumption of Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee is based almost entirely on her ability to raise money and cash in on her husband's massive political machine. What this tells me is that Democrats have nominated someone that some 50% of the country would NEVER vote for.

Oh Wait! No one HAS voted yet.

Before you leave, you should take a look at who is the "Least Objectionable" to the American people.......I'm just sayin.........

Peace,
Chad (The Left) Shue